Contributors are requested to read the instructions of the journal very carefully and follow them.
Aim and Scope |
International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering (IJEHE) is an open access, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal publishing high-quality articles in English in all areas related to Environmental sciences, environment and human health, ecological effects of pollutants in water, air, and soil environments including:
toxic effects of environmental agents on humans and animals and interrelationships between the environment and human health, distribution and ecological effects of pollutants in water, air, and soil environments, Treatment processes for surface and ground waters and municipal, agricultural and industrial wastewaters, including residuals management, point and non-point sources of pollution, water quality standards and the analysis, monitoring and assessment of water quality by chemical, physical and biological methods, hazardous, industrial and municipal solid waste management, and remediation and bioremediation of pollutants, mathematical application and modeling techniques, public health and risk assessment, and occupational health, epidemiologic studies, risk assessment, relevant ethical, legal, social, environmental justice, and policy topics, longitudinal human studies, in vitro and in vivo animal research with a clear relationship to human health, and environmental medicine case reports and new techniques for their study and measurement
The journal welcomes the submission of Original articles, Reviews, and Letter to Editor that meet the general criteria of significance and academic excellence.
Readership |
Environmental health and engineering practitioners, Environmental epidemiologist, Medical practitioners, Environmental toxicologists, Civil engineers, Food safety and Health practitioners.
Submission process |
Manuscripts Submission is acceptable only via Journal URL: http://ijehe.sinaweb.net/
Charges
All manuscripts (original articles, review articles, brief reports, and case reports) except for “letter to the editor” go through manuscript payment phase.
The publication fee as following Tables should be paid after accepting the manuscript and it is payable to the MedKnow publisher account.
Article Type |
Word Limit |
Max Number of Tables and Figures |
Article Processing Fee |
Extra Payment per 600 Words |
Original Article |
3500 |
5 |
300$ |
50$ |
Review Article |
6000 |
Unlimited |
300$ |
50$ |
Brief Report |
1000 |
2 |
150$ |
50$ |
Letter to Editor |
500 |
1 |
Free |
- |
For Iranian authors, because of sanctions and money transfer problems, the journal also accepts the Iranian Rial (IRR).
Article Type |
Word Limit |
Max Number of Tables and Figures |
Article Processing Fee |
Extra Payment per 600 Words |
Original Article |
3500 |
5 |
10,000,000 IRR |
2,000,000 IRR |
Review Article |
6000 |
Unlimited |
10,000,000 IRR |
2,000,000 IRR |
Brief Report |
1000 |
2 |
5,000,000 IRR |
2,000,000 IRR |
Letter to Editor |
500 |
1 |
Free |
- |
Peer review process |
International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following a double-blind peer review process. All manuscripts are considered to be confidential. They are double-blind peer-reviewed by at least 3 anonymous reviewers selected by the Editorial Board. Reviewers’ comments will be discussed by the Editorial Board, and then they will be sent to the corresponding author to consider the necessary actions and responses. The revised manuscript will then evaluated by the Editorial Board, and the final decision of the Editor-in-Chief will be sent to the corresponding author.A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication.
Paper preparation (Manuscript submission) |
Title Page / First Page / Covering Letter
This file should provide:
Types Of Manuscripts |
Type of Manuscripts |
Review article |
Original article |
Brief communication |
Case report |
Letter to the Editor |
Including … |
Meta-analysis Systematic review Narrative review |
Randomized controlled trials, intervention studies, pharmacy practice, outcome studies, case-control series, medication utilization studies, cost-effectiveness studies, and surveys with high response rate |
Like as “Original articles” |
New, interesting and really rare cases with a clear rational of its report |
These should be short and including decisive observations |
Word count limitation (including Abstract, and References) |
5000 |
3000 - 3500 |
2000 |
1500 |
500 |
Headings |
Abstract (un-structured), Keywords, Introduction, Methods, Results, Conclusion, References, Table and Figure legends |
Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, References, Table and Figure legends (Do not divide the Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion into various sub-headings) |
Like as “Original articles” |
Abstract (un-structured), Keywords, Introduction, Case report, Discussion, Reference, Tables and Legends |
To the Editor |
Abstract |
Up to 250 words; un-structured |
Up to 250 words; structured as: Objective, Methods, Results, Conclusion |
Up to 200 words; structured as: Objective, Methods, Results, Conclusion |
Up to 200 words; un-structured |
- |
References |
Unlimited |
Up to 30 |
Up to 12 |
Up to 10 |
Up to 5 |
Tables and Figures |
Unlimited |
Up to 4 |
Up to 2 |
Up to 3 |
- |
Authors |
Up to 6 |
Up to 8 |
Up to 5 |
Up to 4 |
Up to 2 |
-Editorial, Guest Editorial, and Commentary are solicited by the editorial board. -Letters should not duplicate other material published or submitted for publication. Letters considered for publication undergo external peer review. |
Introduction: State the purpose and summarize the rationale for the study or observation. Please provide a clear research question at the end of Introduction section.
Methods: This part should not be structured or have any sub-headings. In the "Methods" section, please start with the type of study, time period and place which it is carried out. It should include and describe the following aspects (without sub-headings):
Ethics: When reporting studies on human beings, indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional or regional) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013 (available at: http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1760318). For prospective studies involving human participants, authors are expected to mention about approval of (regional / national / institutional or independent Ethics Committee or Review Board, obtaining informed consent from adult research participants and obtaining parent(s)' assent for children aged over 7 years participating in the trial. The age beyond which assent would be required could vary as per regional and/or national guidelines. Ensure confidentiality of subjects by desisting from mentioning participants' names, initials or hospital numbers, especially in illustrative material.
Evidence for approval by a local Ethics Committee (for both human studies) must be supplied by the authors on demand. The ethical standards of experiments must be in accordance with the guidelines provided by the “World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects” (http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1760318) for studies involving human beings. The journal will not consider any paper which is ethically unacceptable. A statement on ethics committee permission and ethical practices must be included in all research articles under the “Methods” section.
Selection and Description of Participants: Describe your selection of the observational or experimental participants (patients, and controls) clearly, including eligibility and exclusion criteria and a description of the source population. Reports of randomized clinical trials should present information on all major study elements, including the protocol, assignment of interventions (methods of randomization, concealment of allocation to treatment groups), and the method of masking (blinding), based on the CONSORT Statement (http://www.consort-statement.org).
Reporting Guidelines for Specific Study Designs:
Initiative |
Type of Study |
Source |
CONSORT |
Randomised trials |
http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/consort/ |
STROBE |
Observational studies |
|
PRISMA |
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
|
CARE |
Case reports |
Statistics: Whenever possible, quantify findings and present them with appropriate indicators of measurement error or uncertainty (such as confidence intervals). Exact methods should be used as extensively as possible in the analysis of categorical data. For analysis of measurements, non-parametric methods should be used to compare groups when the distribution of the dependent variable is not normal. Results should be presented with only as much precision as is of scientific value. For example, measures of association, such as odds ratios, should ordinarily be reported to two significant digits. Measures of uncertainty, such as confidence intervals, should be used consistently, including in figures that present aggregated results. Except when one-sided tests are required by study design, such as in non-inferiority trials, all reported P values should be two-sided. In general, P values larger than 0.01 should be reported to two decimal places, those between 0.01 and 0.001 to three decimal places; P values smaller than 0.001 should be reported as P < 0.001. Notable exceptions to this policy include P values arising in the application of stopping rules to the analysis of clinical trials and genetic-screening studies. Authors should report losses to observation (such as dropouts from a clinical trial). When data are summarized in the “Results” section, specify the statistical methods used to analyze them. Avoid non-technical uses of technical terms in statistics, such as 'random' (which implies a randomizing device), 'normal', 'significant', 'correlations', and 'sample'. Define statistical terms, abbreviations, and most symbols. Specify the computer software and each analytical tests used.
Results: This part should not be structured or have any sub-headings. Results should start with baseline parameters and comparison of groups. Present your results in a logical sequence in the text, tables, and illustrations, giving the main or most important findings first. Do not repeat in the text all the data in the tables or illustrations; emphasize or summarize only important observations. Extra- or supplementary materials and technical detail can be placed in an appendix where it will be accessible but will not interrupt the flow of the text; alternatively, it can be published only in the electronic version of the journal.
When data are summarized in the “Results” section, give numeric results not only as derivatives (for example, percentages) but also as the absolute numbers from which the derivatives were calculated, and specify the statistical methods used to analyze them. Restrict tables and figures to those needed to explain the argument of the paper and to assess its support. Use graphs as an alternative to tables with many entries; do not duplicate data in graphs and tables. Where scientifically appropriate, analysis of data by variables such as age and sex should be included.
Discussion: This part must include summary of:
Key Findings (primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, results as they relate to a prior hypothesis);
Strengths and limitations of the study (study question, study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation);
Interpretation and implications in the context of the totality of evidence (is there a systematic review to refer to? if not, could one be reasonably done here and now?; what this study adds to the available evidence; effects on patient care and health policy; possible mechanisms);
Controversies raised by this study; and Future research directions (for this particular research collaboration, underlying mechanisms, clinical research).
Do not repeat in detail data or other material given in the “Introduction” or the “Results” section. In particular, contributors should avoid making statements on economic benefits and costs unless their manuscript includes economic data and analysis. Avoid claiming priority and alluding to work that has not been completed. New hypotheses may be stated if needed, however they should be clearly labeled as such. About 40 references can be included. These articles generally should not have more than six authors.
References
References should be numbered consecutively in the order in which they are first mentioned in the text (not in alphabetic order). Identify references in text, tables, and legends by Arabic numerals in superscript with square bracket after the punctuation marks. References cited only in tables or figure legends should be numbered in accordance with the sequence established by the first identification in the text at the point where the table or figure is first mentioned. Use the style of the examples below, which are based on the formats used by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) in Index Medicus. The titles of journals should be abbreviated according to the style used in Index Medicus. Use complete name of the journal for non-indexed journals. Avoid using abstracts as references. Information from manuscripts submitted but not accepted should be cited in the text as "unpublished observations" with written permission from the source. Avoid citing a "personal communication" unless it provides essential information not available from a public source, in which case the name of the person and date of communication should be cited in parentheses in the text.
For presenting different types of references, please refer to ICMJE Guidelines: http://www.icmje.org, or http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/uniform_requirements.html.
Examples for citation in text of manuscript:
Journal article:
Chapter in a book: Poursafa P, Kelishadi R. Particulate Matter: Sources, Emission Rates and Health Effects. Non-respiratory Health Hazards of Particulate Matter. 1 ed: NOVA; 2011. P. 250-7.
Book: Eaton AD, Franson MAH. Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater: Amer Public Health Assn; 2005.
Report: USEPA. Technologies For Treating MtBE and Other Fuel Oxygenates. Washington, DC 20460: Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation2004.
URL: WHO. Indoor air pollution 2011 [accessed 2011, 17 Dec.]; Available from: http://www.who.int/indoorair/publications/7989289041683/en/index.html .
Figures |
Tables |
Protection of Patients' Right to Privacy |
Identifying information should not be published in written descriptions, photographs, sonograms, CT scans, etc., and pedigrees unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and the patient (or parent or guardian, wherever applicable) gives informed consent for publication. Authors should remove patients' names from figures unless they have obtained informed consent from the patients. The journal abides by ICMJE guidelines:
1) Authors, not the journals nor the publisher, need to obtain the patient consent form before the publication and have the form properly archived. The consent forms are not to be uploaded with the cover letter or sent through email to editorial or publisher offices.
2) If the manuscript contains patient images that preclude anonymity, or a description that has obvious indication to the identity of the patient, a statement about obtaining informed patient consent should be indicated in the manuscript.
Ethical concerns: |
The Journal will adhere to the principles and recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) and the European Association of Science Editors (EASE). It will also follow research reporting statements of the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) Network. Submissions should conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals, developed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
Conflicts of interest:
Authors must acknowledge and declare any sources of funding and potential conflicting interest, such as receiving funds or fees by, or holding stocks and shares in, an organization that may profit or lose through publication of your paper. Declaring a competing interest will not lead to automatic rejection of the paper, but we would like to be made aware of it.
Acknowledgements:
All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be covered in the acknowledgement section. It should include persons who provided technical help, writing assistance and departmental head that only provided general support. Financial and material support should be acknowledged in the statement of funding sources.
Plagiarism:
The authors are not allowed to utilize verbatim text of previously published papers or manuscripts submitted elsewhere.
Authorship Criteria |
Authorship credit should only be based on substantial contributions to each of the following four components:
Participation solely in the acquisition of funding or the collection of data does not justify authorship. General supervision of the research group is not sufficient for authorship. Each contributor should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content of the manuscript. The order of naming the contributors should be based on the relative contribution of the contributor towards the study and writing the manuscript. Once submitted, the order cannot be changed without written consent of all the contributors. The journal prescribes a maximum number of authors for manuscripts depending upon the type of manuscript, its scope and number of institutions involved
Copyright |
The copyright form is a doc, .docx, .pdf, .jpg, .gif, .png file (Do not zip the file), less than 10MB in size, which is signed by all the contributors and states the manuscript is only the work of the author(s) stated, has been submitted solely to IJEHE and that it has not been previously published or presented, either in whole or in part, nor have the findings been posted online. Submission of a manuscript implies that if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher. The corresponding author must include a statement confirming full access to all aspects of the research and writing process, and takes final responsibility for the paper.
Submission checklist |
The following list will be useful during the final checking of a manuscript prior to sending it to the journal for review. Please consult this Guide for Authors for further details of any item. Ensure that the following items are present:
Contributors' form |
Click here to download instructions
Click here to download copyright form
These ready to use templates are made to help the contributors write as per the requirements of the Journal.
Save the templates on your computer and use them with a word processor program.
Click open the file and save as the manuscript file.
In the program keep 'Document Map' and 'Comments' on from 'View' menu to navigate through the file.
Download Template for Original Articles/ABSTRACT Reports. (.DOT file)
Download Template for Case Reports. (.DOT file)
Download Template for Review Articles. (.DOT file)
Download Template for Letter to the Editor. (.DOT file)